Sublette Examiner Volume 2, Number 1 - April 4, 2002 brought to you online by Pinedale Online
by Cat Urbigkit
In recent weeks, officials from both Fremont and Lincoln counties declared
gray wolves and grizzly bears "unacceptable species," citing the danger
to human health and safety as a major concern.
While the threat to human safety posed by grizzly bears is evident,
what has been the subject of little discussion is the possible danger
posed by wolves. This issue was recently given discussion by the Montana
Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks as the agency prepared its statewide
wolf management plan.
"Public safety is an important consideration because species such as
the gray wolf, mountain lion, black or grizzly bear are capable of injuring
or potentially killing a person," according to the draft Montana wolf
conservation and management plan.
A few examples were provided. The document stated: "In Canada’s Algonquin
Provincial Park, four different wolves progressively lost their fear
of humans, resulting in five separate incidents over the last 11 years.
These four wolves, though previously non-aggressive, eventually bit
humans. Two incidents of wolf aggression towards people were serious
and required stitches.
"Each of the wolves was accustomed to humans and had been frequenting
campgrounds, running off with backpacks, human food and other camping
items over a period of months," according to the document. "People interacted
with these wolves at very close range until the wolf became too bold.
Park managers removed the four wolves.
"Some wolves in Denali National Park in Alaska have grown increasingly
tolerant of close proximity to humans in and around campsites, although
no injuries have been reported.
"One incident on Vargas Island, British Columbia, in which a wolf bit
a camper paralleled the incidents in Algonquin Provincial Park. Park
managers removed two wolves that had been loitering near camping areas.
One recent incident in Icy Bay near Anchorage, Alaska, left a young
boy with several stitches after a wolf bite. This wolf was also removed.
"It appears that most wolf-human encounters were not precipitated by
the wolf perceiving the human as prey because of how the wolves behaved,
the presence of domestic dogs, or the sequence of events," according
to the Montana document.
This is in stark contrast to mountain lion incidents, in which it appears
lions have perceived humans as prey; or in bear incidents in which bears
attack after surprise encounters with humans, or apparently in defense
of cubs or food.
"For wolves, a loss of fear seems to be a common thread running through
all North American wolf incidents resulting in human injury," the plan
stated.
"It appears that wolves can habituate to humans or human activities
as readily as bears or mountain lions," the document stated. "Whether
or not this degree of familiarity translates to a threat to human safety
may hinge on prompt management response by the appropriate authorities.
"It appears that habituation in wolves may not require a consistent
pattern of food conditioning as seems the case for bears. Wolves may
increase their tolerance for the close proximity of people through repeated,
long-term social interaction with people and ‘being rewarded’ in some
fashion, whether food or otherwise."
Interestingly, most cases of wolves inflicting injuries on humans occurred
in parks or preserves where wolves were legally protected. That’s the
cause of concern regarding recent incidents in Yellowstone National
Park.
An early March Bozeman Chronicle article by Scott McMillion reported
that wolves in Yellowstone National Park "have become increasingly bold
around people and at least one pair might have scavenged a handout from
a law-breaking traveler this week."
Park service officials have received reports that wolves have approached
cars containing people, peering in the windows. Wolves have also walked
close to people busy ‘wolf watching,’ and such encounters are reportedly
becoming more common.
The park service is now prepared to take action against wolves appearing
too bold towards humans. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has authorized
the agency to use "less-than-lethal munitions (rubber bullets)" in an
attempt to aversively condition the animals into maintaining their distance.
Photo credits: Jim Carbley
|
See The Archives for past articles.